Quantcast
Channel: Cognate Socialist Dystopia
Viewing all 585 articles
Browse latest View live

11/8 Recognise Islamist threat, or take the consequences

$
0
0

Recognise Islamist threat, or take the consequences

BRENDAN Nicholson’s story quoting former army chief Peter Leahy paints a grim picture (“We’ll fight Islam 100 years”, 9/8). If we are facing a war initiated by religious extremists, we must defend ourselves with every resource available. Historically, the first casualty in war is freedom.
But before we can defend ourselves we must recognise threats exist. Who would have thought bombs in the London Underground would have been detonated by people born and raised in England? In Australia, we admit people from societies in which violence is endemic. So it is no surprise that violence emerges here.
We read with horror that people with Australian passports gloat about beheadings they have committed in Iraq. The failure to recognise the possibility of atrocities being committed here suggests a level of naivety which may cost us dearly in the future. Failure to act could mean fighting a war with hands tied behind our backs.
John Downing, Ringwood North, Vic
THE war against radical Islamism will be lost unless we overcome its stranglehold over influential politicians, prominent media figures, the universities, and institutions such as the Human Rights Commission.
They blame the West for the hideous actions of the radicals and advocate the policies of appeasement used since the 9/11 and Bali atrocities. This is taken as evidence of weakness and it is continually exploited.
Its counter-productive effect is seen in the murderous and anti-Semitic behaviour of some Australian Muslims, whose contempt for this country is widely broadcast. Nor can we rely on so-called moderate Muslim leaders, who basically act as a front for the radicals. Their dismissive response to Tony Abbott’s plea to the Muslim community for co-operation illustrates the problem.
Merv Bendle, Mount Louisa, Qld
THE views of Peter Leahy were timely as well as refreshing. They were timely because they contained a clear warning to Australia and the world of the rapidly rising dangers of Islamism. They were refreshing because they were so different from all the rubbish that has been written on the subject in recent times.
Winston Churchill once warned the world of the coming dangers of Nazism in the early 1930s for which he was soundly ridiculed and vilified. I wonder if Leahy’s views, warning of a much greater danger this time, will be equally disregarded before it is too late?
Edgar Gold, Brisbane, Qld
WE should not be having discussions on plans for Australian-born terrorists when they eventually arrive back to update their Centrelink status. The most logical and cost-effective method is to revoke their passports and ensure they are never allowed anywhere near this country.
Any suggestion from so-called moderate Muslims that they are suitable citizens of modern society is absurd. They were radicalised here in Australia. The main issue is that a silent majority of Australian Muslims tacitly support their aims.
Steven Ginders, Ferny Creek, Vic
THANK goodness for Peter Leahy who is able to analyse the situation with Islamists in the Middle East. These conflicts will take decades to resolve. When the third or fourth generation comes of age, they will take up arms as did those before them. In some parts of the world, armed children can scarcely lift their weapons. That’s the terrible reality for our grandchildren.
John Bain, South Bunbury, WA
THE plight of the Yazidis, who are facing genocide in Iraq, drew a predictable response from Australia’s Muslim community over the weekend — demonstrations against Israel. The more Muslims kill other Muslims, infidels and Christians, the more our Muslim community protests about Gaza. One can only conclude that beheadings and mass executions are OK, as long as they are committed in the name of Islam.
Royston Mitchell, Golden Grove, SA
ISLAM is a collection of peoples wedded to a book that has no credibility as literature or wisdom. But it inspires a barbaric, genocidal agenda. Islam is not really a religion but a political ideology dedicated to cleansing Earth of all infidels. Predictions of a fight for 100 years is ill-conceived — the fight began when Australia’s immigration policies allowed this ideology into the country.
D. Clarnette, Rosebud, Vic

Last Post, August 11

$
0
0

Last Post, August 11

AUSTRALIAN law enforcement officers can hardly expect Islamic leaders to condemn their jihadi co-religionists. Were they to do this, they would be condemning the actions of their prophet, whom these young men are simply emulating and who led numerous jihad attacks, claiming: “Allah has made me victorious with terror”.
Gabrielle Lord, Randwick, NSW
Why is it that Islamist fighters, who despise Western values so much, embrace Western mobile phones, Facebook and Twitter, also using Western weaponry and vehicles? Surely this goes against their medieval beliefs.
David Moore, Croydon, SA
What sensationalist claims you have published (“We’ll fight Islam 100 years”, 9/8). On our present trajectory, we will all have converted to Islam or been beheaded within 50 years, and therefore in 100 years will be living blissfully happily in a sharia caliphate.
Bryan Connor, Cloncurry, Qld
Here we are with Boko Haram stealing Christian schoolgirls to sell as sex slaves and Islamic State degenerates forcing Yazidi women into marriages to killers in Iraq, and not a word out of the feminists. Too busy worrying about the glass ceiling to bother about the big picture?
Chris Squelch, Townsville, Qld
Twelve months ago your headline “We’ll fight Islam 100 years” would have been unthinkable. Thanks to Peter Leahy and Michael Krause for taking the issue by the scruff of the neck and dragging it out into the public arena, and congratulations to The Weekend Australian for having the sense and courage to print it.
John McHarg, Baldivis, WA
In the fight against the real enemy we must be careful not to alienate the decent Muslim majority. Headlines such as “We’ll fight Islam 100 years” risk conflating Islam with the radical Islamo-fascist minority world view, inviting the radicals to allege a Western “crusade” against Islam in general, something Muslims everywhere would feel obliged to resist.
David Poignand, Hackett, ACT
A world war is being waged between the followers of two religious figures, Christ and Mohammed, whose only point of convergence is a place in heaven for true believers. Those of us sufficiently evolved to observe that there is not a shred of evidence for an afterlife or a higher state of existence called heaven, can only look on in disbelief.
Brian Sanaghan, West Preston, Vic
Once they learn that the Koran and the Bible are works of fantasy, that there is no heaven and the only hell that exists is the one they have created, peace will surely prevail.
Marshall Perron, Buderim, Qld

CUT AND PASTE: Are the imams chuckling over Mike Carlton’s impersonation of Yasser Arafat?

$
0
0

Are the imams chuckling over Mike Carlton’s impersonation of Yasser Arafat?

Does my carbon footprint look big? Hugh Grant tweets August 2:
THE increasingly insane Emma Thompson is sailing with Greenpeace to help #savethearctic. Track her and laugh at her anoraks @savethearctic
News.com.au, Friday:
BRITISH actor Emma Thompson has been photographed holding a sign ... that said “Tony Abbott Climate Change Is Real I’m Standing On It” while she visited the Smeerenburg glacier, east of Greenland. She made the trip to the Arctic aboard a Greenpeace ship ... Esperanza ...
More about MV Esperanza, depletedcranium.com, August 9, 2008:
LET’S take a look at how Greenpeace gets around ... when they’re not flying first class to a conference or protest that is. The MV Esperanza … (has) two enormous … marine diesel engines … Marine diesel … is consumed in enormous volumes because the engines are constantly at work … marine diesel (is) a lot cheaper (heavier and dirtier) than the land-based kind … there are plenty of … things (Greenpeace) could do to make (Esperanza) cleaner that they seem to have elected not to do ... (but) they’d likely have to give up …(the) high power gyroscopically stabilised two-way satellite dish … (and the) video editing room … the cabins on the ship look downright lavish and … the ship is not only air conditioned, but it has very large refrigerators and freezers on it. Here’s an idea: ditch all those massive power-sucking refrigeration systems ... and all the other luxuries you’d expect for a crew of candyass rich college hippies. ... (including) ... a Hughes 500D (helicopter). … the most inefficient variety of aircraft ever built. … the aircraft gets a bit less than 3 miles to the gallon. …… What is that smell in the air? … the stench of hypocrisy …
Never let the facts get in the way of a good smear. PT reviews Mark Latham’s book The Political Bubble in The Saturday Paper, Saturday:
LATHAM (writes) “The fact (is) that most conservative … media commentators come from privileged backgrounds …” Andrew Bolt, Nick Cater, Janet Albrechtsen …
Privileged? John Van Tiggelen, Sydney Morning Herald, November 19, 2011:
(ANDREW) Bolt snr’s teaching career took the family into Australia’s searing interior … Darwin … Tarcoola … Warramboo … Tailem Bend …
Privileged? Hope 103.2, June 5, 2013:
LEIGH Hatcher: I want you to sketch for us the kind of place ... in which you grew up at Southampton …
Nick Cater: It was very much a lower middle class sort of enclave. People worked at the oil refinery … My parents were teachers …
Privileged? The Age, February 26, 2005
ALBRECHTSEN … grew up in a strongly left-wing household in Adelaide. “My father was a builder, and my mother, she was a tailor…”…Educated at Seacombe High School, in Adelaide’s southern suburbs …
Channel 9 News, Saturday:
MUSLIM groups have condemned the recent suspension of Fairfax columnist Mike Carlton ... In a letter to Fairfax CEO Greg Hywood ... the Australian National Imams Council, Islamic Council of NSW and the Muslim Legal Network NSW among others say they will boycott the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper unless the outspoken columnist is reinstated ... “ ... with the resignation of Mr Carlton from your publications we have now lost one of the very few voices advocating for the Palestinian cause in the country.”
No doubt the Imams will enjoy this. Murf Oscar comments on Andrew Bolt’s blog, August 18, 2012:
ONE of my prized possessions is the vinyl recording Mike Carlton’s News Review, HAM 108, distributed by Hammard TV. Featuring extracts from his 1980s Sydney morning radio segment, the identities assumed include: ... Yassa Crackafat ...

11/8 Rise of anti-semitism from this war is no accident

$
0
0

Rise of anti-semitism from this war is no accident

WHILE no civilian casualties are good, reports are emerging that strongly question the number of civilian casualties in Gaza.
The BBC’s head of statistics has highlighted that the figures presented are highly improbable. He says “some of the conclusions being drawn from them may be premature”. With that, Hamas’s illusion begins to crack. The reality behind it is far uglier, and more dangerous, than many have realised.
Far away from the Middle East there are two additional sets of victims, neither Israeli not Palestinian. The first are Jews, facing rising anti-semitism. The second group of victims includes many of those spewing out anti-semitism. They too are victims as they act against their values in aid of a greater purpose. Those who have fallen into this trap will explain the uniqueness of the current conflict, and reflect on the reported number of civilian casualties. Their call to arms, however, rests on a carefully manufactured illusion.
It seems that, statistically speaking, the high civilian casualty rate in Gaza is very likely to conceal many Hamas combatants. This is no surprise as a similar situation occurred in Operation Cast Lead (2008-09) when Hamas, at the time, claimed only 50 fighters were killed but later admitted to a figure of 600 to 700 fighters, a figure almost identical to Israeli reports during the conflict.
The supposedly disproportionate civilian casualty rate has been used not only to justify and mobilise hostility to Israel, but also to defend outright anti-semitism including comparisons to the Holocaust. How dare you raise the issue of anti-semitism when so many people are being killed, a former Facebook friend wrote to me. If the number of civilian casualties is in fact similar to other conflicts, or proportionally less than other conflicts, when comparing the rate of civilian to combatant casualties, then a lot of people have been working off a false premise.
The reliance on a false premise led many to the conclusion that Israel deserved unique condemnation, and the issue deserved priority above all else on the international agenda. If the conflict was not exceptional, there was no basis for this special treatment.
As I write this, rockets have resumed and the IDF just announced they were about to take action to eliminate the threat. One Twitter user, with a free Palestine image, responded saying that another Nuremberg was waiting for Israel.
This Gaza Holocaust analogy is spectacularly bad, and deliberately anti-semitic. It has been repeated so many times that it is becoming a Big Lie. And therein lies the second crack in the Hamas illusion.
The anti-semitic imagery used in this conflict is beyond anything we have seen before. It looks like a deliberate social media strategy of Hamas, and one that follows perfectly from the anti-semitism in their mainstream media channels, including on children’s TV shows like Tomorrow’s Pioneers.
The treatment of all casualties as civilians, the overt anti-semitism and the comparison of Gaza to the Holocaust are part of a coherent Hamas social media strategy. The strategy has been openly promoted to activists via official Hamas channels, in Arabic of course. MEMRI translated this guide in mid-July, but it didn’t get enough attention.
Consider two points taken from the guide: Avoid entering into a political argument with a Westerner aimed at convincing him that the Holocaust is a lie and deceit; instead, equate it with Israel’s crimes against Palestinian civilians”; “Anyone killed or martyred is to be called a civilian from Gaza or Palestine, before we talk about his status in jihad or his military rank. Don’t forget to always add ‘innocent civilian’ or ‘innocent citizen’ in your description of those killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza.”
Our cracks suddenly open into fissures, and ground on which Hamas’s illusion rests starts to fall way. Both these points from the guide are repeated constantly in social media. Only some comes from hard core Hamas supporters who may have seen the guide. Much comes from people who have no idea about the ideology of Hamas, or its social media war strategy.
The technical term for people who have been suckered in to supporting the Hamas social media strategy, and therefore Hamas more broadly, is “useful idiots”. Rich Lowry has written a great piece about the impact of these useful idiots, but missed the Hamas strategy to deliberately create more of them. I previously noted that Facebook was caught in a social media war, but I missed how anti-semitism and the creation of useful idiots was part of this strategy.
I’ve created a resource page to explain the problem with the Holocaust analogy it. Some, including Muslim friends, quickly saw the problem. Others, anti-racism activists with no specific connection to the conflict, refused to see it. For them raising anti-semitism was trying to dodge the issue of the casualties and the criticality of stopping Israel. I felt I was staring down a rabbit hole. Comparisons between Israel and the Nazis are given explicitly as an example in the Working Definition of Anti-Semitism. It’s not a matter of interpretation or debate.
The way people around the world have been misled as part of a deliberate Hamas propaganda strategy is outrageous. The real civilian deaths, inevitable in armed conflict, are still a tragedy, but to use support for human rights as part of a war strategy is morally reprehensible. We knew they were doing it with the living, now we see they are doing it with the dead as well. To promote Holocaust trivialisation as part of a war strategy is also utterly reprehensible. Hamas advocates genocide of Jews in its charter, but how did anti-racists come to adopt this vile poison and promote the agenda of genocide?
Many who have fallen for the Hamas propaganda strategy have reacted angrily when told their comments are anti-semitic and defended their position with reference to the “unique nature” of the current conflict. With that premise exposed as a deliberate illusion, they have a bitter pill to swallow. Many seek other ways to validate their actions. In doing so many may fall further into the racist arguments flooding across social media.
Unless people stop and take stock, Hamas may well achieve its real purpose, to harm Jewish people around the globe. The rise in anti-semitism is a key outcome of this war, and it seems it is far from an accident.
Andre Oboler is CEO of the Online Hate Prevention Institute (OHPI). OHPI’s guide on reporting anti-semitism on Facebook was released on Friday.


33 COMMENTS
132 people listening


Ronnie Rabbit
Ronnie Rabbit
Isn't it ironic and irrational that Hamas wishes "to harm Jewish people around the globe".   You would think, from the Palestinian point of view, that Jews living in Europe or America or Australia would be "good" Jews  because, after all, they are not occupying lands taken from the Palestinians.    If all Jews dispersed elsewhere then the Palestinians could get their land back.   So why build up world wide anti-Semitism?
Creating hatred against Jews in countries other than Israel can only be useful in terms of propaganda and the enlistment of "useful idiots".   There are far too many "useful idiots" wandering around in the West.   It is not at all hard to see that the whole Hamas strategy of firing rockets from locations close to civilians and forcing Israel to respond is cleverly designed for propaganda purposes.
Rob
Rob
We can blame SBS and Auntie for a good deal of that.  I don't think they've yet reported even once the UN's admission that Hamas rockets have been stored in so-called 'safe havens' and launched from schools.  I've often wondered who's tallying the body count in Gaza, and at this point it's clear that it's Hamas producing the numbers: our 'impartial observers' on the ground have apparently learned to keep their mouths shut. The UN has been worse than useless: Ban Ki Moon is weak, and a good deal less than honest about what's really happening in Gaza. Even Egypt is unhappy with Hamas ... they're certainly not giving aid and comfort to the radicals. The Middle East is descending into the worst sort of barbarism, and we're just watching it happen. As Edmund Burke famously said, 'All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.' And that's exactly what Auntie, SBS and Fairfax are doing.
Ronnie Rabbit
Ronnie Rabbit
@Rob  - agree with most of that except the inference in you final sentence that Auntie, the SBS and Fairfax are "good men" doing nothing. Their actions are entirely calculated and there is nothing "good" about it.
Jake
Jake
Israel is hated because it believes, in building settlements on civilian lands captured by force, that "might is right". This ideology simply doesn't gel with 21st century Western youth, who do not believe that taking something from someone else by force is ever justifiable.
Race has absolutely nothing to do with it. Today's youth dislike power and those who hold it, believing in a more egalitarian way of life in which no one person can force another to do something.
vince
vince
@Jake Some perspective on the civilian lands "captured by force".  It was as a result of the Arabs not accepting the UN resolution in 1947, their invasion of the mandate of Palestine, which led to the 1948 civil war.  The 1949 Armistace Agreements allotted a further 26% of land to Israel, the Golan Heights to Syria, the West Bank to Jordan and the Gaza strip to Egypt.  The 1967 six day war instigated by the Arabs on Israel, resulted in their defeat and loss of the Sinai, West Bank and Golan Heights.  The Sinai was returned to Egypt as part of the peace accord in 1979.
James
James
Sick propaganda from both sides. 
The assertion here seems to be that 'we only killed __ children: not __ children. What do you think we are: monsters?'
I find the fighters on both sides to be monsters.
Murder upon murder upon murder - all for the sake of ideology and religion.
No sky faerie is worth the death of a child.
This 'religion' schtick is acceptable when it involves personal delusion only: but the real problem is that you infect and kill children with all this nonsense.
Logical
Logical
@James  There is no equivalence between the two sides.  Hamas has been killing it's own people i.e. those who demur in response to Hamas' methods.  But the locals are fed up with them.
Bilbo
Bilbo
@James You don't understand at all. Hamas is all about ideology - the destruction of Israel - and doesn't care how many of its people it sacrifices in the process. The Israeli (secular) government is doing what you'd expect any responsible government to do: defend its people from attack and try to ensure their safety and security.
Richard
Richard
18C of the RDA has not prevented any of the hate speech currently being propagated against Jews and others. But on the other hand it stands ready to prevent a rebuttal.
This type of article illustrates why free speech is so important - airing arguments in a free press in public - is the best way for forming and informed opinion not based on bigotry and hate.
Phil
Phil
In their threat to boycott the SMH over the departure of Mike Carlton Muslim groups are confirming their support for terrorist group Hamas and its declared intent to eradicate the state of Israel. If the Palestinians want peace there is simple straight forward solution for those living in Gaza – rid the strip of Hamas and accept the fact that the Israeli PM’s have earlier made 3 attempts to establish a 2 state solution - in 2000, in 2005 and in 2008.These offers would have guaranteed Palestinian autonomy and, eventually, statehood. In the long run these offers provide a template for a solution to this protracted conflict and Australian Muslim groups need to recognise that in their support of Hamas they are undermining any hope of peace for the Palestinian people.  Andre Oboler forgot to mention that the immediate end game for Hamas is for the Israelis to kill as many Palestinians as possible so that the world’s media will condemn Israel for overreaction to the rockets being fired into the Jewish state; remembering that Israeli governments have built shelters for their people whereas Hamas is telling its people to return to their homes even after the IDF has pre-warned the Gaza inhabitants of an attack on Hamas rocket sites.
Julie
Julie
Thank you Andre for this rare piece of reality on the propaganda of the current hamas offensive against Israel. The West is so gullible and easily manipulated and muslim terrorist know exactly how to play us. They know we care about the death and suffering of others especially children even though they don't. Instead hamas cowards use civilians as a tactical advantage and human shields, and where is the condemnation from the ABC and SMH. The reality is that all hamas has to do is stop firing rockets and building tunnels into Israel and the fighting ends.
Dianne
Dianne
& yet again, I note the "Compass special" which deals with child abuse in a Jewish school (?) where was the "Compass Special" when little girls are forced into muslim marraiges, or when little girls are subject to genital mutilation?  That's right, the ABC only feels that it has to go after Jews & Christians.
Sam
Sam
There have been countless ABC programs on child sex abuse in the church. This is the first I can recall about a Jewish context so it has hardly been covered excessively. It is also a subject of legitimate public interest when a community group has a veto on reporting crimes in its precinct to the police.
brent
brent
@Dianne I see Four Corners is investigating the cover up of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church tonight yet again ..... hasn't this already been covered by the RC ? 
Rose
Rose
Thank Heavens we have The Australian, otherwise we wouldn't have any logical debate about what is really happening. The ABC should hang their heads in shame with their distortion of the facts and their support of Hamas and lack of acknowledgement of the worrying rise of anti semetism
Phil
Phil
@Rose The Communication’s Minister is sitting on his hands allowing the ABC’S  green/left bias open slather all funded by taxpayers including coalition voters; free entertainment is the ultimate ‘entitlement’ that needs to go along with all the biased reporting.  A better idea to get the ABC’s $1.3bn budget off the backs of taxpayers along with its overpaid MD who gets $273,787 more per year than the Prime Minister would be to cut the broadcaster’s funding completely and re-introduce the licensing system abolished by Mr Whitlam; this would force the broadcaster to frame programs, news and current affairs that some in the public are prepared to pay for and if that means only the Labor and Greens voters are prepared to purchase a license so well and good.  At least conservative voters would not be forced to subsidise Labor’s left/green front office.  The BBC has relied on managing a licensing system for years and there is no reason the ABC can’t do the same.
Anthony (Tony)
Anthony (Tony)
On my world map I can find Gaza but no mention of Palestine. Did not Nostradamus predict the destruction of the middle east, in or around that land? 
Steve1
Steve1
Good article. I've been waiting to see the cat belled in this particular repeat of standard Hamas casualty propaganda.
I remember the massive lies, the rank fantasy of allegations during the Jenin action....then the relevation of the facts that were completely different.
It's standard fare and how true to say that people who buy the propaganda and unwittingly subvert their values are also victims.

Daniel
Daniel
456 children have been killed in Gaza according to the UN.
This is the part that sickens me the most.
By killing children, I consider that Israel is not acting like a liberal parliamentary democracy, it is not acting in accordance with high moral standards, rather it is stooping to the morality of the terrorists that we all oppose.
That is the reason I condemn Israel's actions, not because of a terrorist groups manual on spin.
Tony
Tony
@Daniel "456 children have been killed in Gaza according to the UN" - please be aware that the UN simply quotes statistics supplied by the Hamas controlled Palestinian Ministry of Health. The UN has no independent sources. How many of those 456 were actually teenage Hamas fighters? We don't know. How many are pure inventions by Hamas? We don't know. Certainly some children have been killed, some as an inevitable result of the conflict (since Hamas fires its missiles from close proximity to Palestinian schools and hospitals meaning that returning fire risks causing civilian casualties) and some through 'mishaps' when Hamas missiles have gone astray and killed Palestinian children rather than the Israelis (including Israeli children) that they intended to kill.
John
John
@Daniel Unless you are a child or teenager your argument is culpably naive. Do you think    we were villainous for bombing Germany and Japan during WW2? We killed millions of civilians. We even killed hundreds of thousands of civilians who were on our own side in occupied countries such as France, and so did French troops. There is simply no other way to win when you are up against an enemy who is committed by word and deed to your destruction as HAMAS is to Israel and ISIS is to us. The only alternative is to submit and see our own children enslaved or to die.
Brett
Brett
Did you even read the article? SMH some people are completely oblivious to the fact that they are pawns in a much wider conflict than Israel v Palestine. Useful idiots that get information directly from terrorists to trumpet their self righteousness will be among the first up against the wall when their usefulness is up and a caliphate is achieved. Read your history books because that's where we are headed.
John
John
@Daniel How many children have been killed in Syria? I read about 6,000 in the paper and some said as high as 15,000. How many by our own forces in Iraq and Afghanistan? I find it curious that there is never a demonstartion about these, but there is ALWAYS a demonstration about Israelis. Why the double-standard if not racism or anti-Semitism?
Edmond
Edmond
@Daniel Daniel, there is an image distributed by Hamas which has the photos of a dead child on the floor and a deead man lying on a blood covered bed.  The caption says:  "This is what the Gaza Medics found when they entered a home visited by the IDF."  
The piece is horrendous and any normal person would be revolted by it.
More nauseating though is that this is the photo of two members of the Fogel family, a Jewish family of 6 slaughtered by Palestinians some 2 years ago.  Those who created that fraudulent piece were not even smart enough to realize that a Mezuzah (a parchment inscribed with religious texts and attached in a case to the doorposts of a Jewish house) can be clearly seen in the photo.  How low could one stoop in disseminating lies?
Daniel, take out your calculator:.  Hamas declared that 1,900 civilians had been killed, including the 486 children you mention, plus about 400 women (revised upwards from the 250 a few days before).  Add the two and you arrive at "886 innocents".  This leaves 1.014 innocent dead men.  Now we know that the male/female distribution in Gaza is about equal, so unless Israeli bombs are able to distinguish between a man and a woman, a laughable concept, has it not occurred to anyone that the figures provided by Hamas to the UN are false and that it is more likely that the figures should include at least another 600 fighters and that the UN has taken the bail hook line and sinker??
That some cannot see the dishonesty, just like the dishonesty mentioned in this article is mind-boggling. 

GREATEST!! This Jewish chick won’t be scared by anonymous cowards

$
0
0

This Jewish chick won’t be scared by anonymous cowards

TO all those cowards out there who threaten our children under the guise of drunkenness, who paint anti-Jewish graffiti on our schools under the cover of darkness, and who write and shout anti-Semitic posts and slogans under the mask of anonymity and the pretext of events in the Middle East, I say this: for centuries we were persecuted, impoverished, discriminated against, hated and victimised. For centuries we survived, regrouped and thrived. For millennia we defied the laws of nature and the laws of history.
“Never again” is not just a phrase for us but a principled cause. We are a people proud of the gifts we have given mankind, proud of surviving against all odds, and confident that we have much more to offer in the future.
Though few in number and spread to the four corners of Earth, we survived as a people, never assimilating into anonymity.
So crawl back into your holes, because this is one chick who isn’t scared and won’t be cowered by your deeds. My people will live after you’re long gone because hate never wins and justice and righteousness are not the product of a popular vote but the foundation on which all civilisation is established.
Alla Pilman, North Bondi, NSW
IN their threat to boycott The Sydney Morning Herald over the departure of columnist Mike Carlton, Muslim groups are confirming their support for terrorist group Hamas and its declared intent to eradicate Israel.
If Palestinians want peace, there is a straight forward solution for those living in Gaza — rid the strip of Hamas and accept the fact that the Israelis have made three attempts to establish a two-state solution. These offers would have guaranteed Palestinian autonomy and, eventually, statehood. In the long run, these offers provide a template for a solution to this protracted conflict and Australian Muslim groups should recognise that in their support of Hamas they are undermining any hope of peace for the Palestinian people.
Phil Herd, Kangaloon, NSW
Menace of Twitter
I AM grateful to Chris Kenny for fortifying my wish to have nothing to do with Twitter (“Insidious Twitter not always as it seems”, 9/8).
Exposure to examples through your columns and elsewhere shows what a menace it can be. It encourages obnoxious and inane abuse. Its sloganeering defies intellect and, used by so many politicians, probably explains today’s regrettable standards of debate and leadership. And, not least, its pernicious use by our terrorist enemies spreads hatred and bile.
John Kidd, Auchenflower, Qld
Two sides to APC matter
YOUR public criticism of the Australian Press Council is unfortunate. Even more so, because on the facts you’ve presented, it seems like it might be justified (“Press Council runs off the rails”, 9/8). It may not be possible within the legal or bureaucratic rules of the APC, but affording chairman Julian Disney as much space to reply as you’ve used in your editorial would seem a fair way to help resolve the Arthur Geitzelt issue.
Applying the light of day to deliberations made behind closed doors is often a powerful and beneficial function of newspapers. It’s been done only from your perspective so far. How about The Australian and the APC letting all of us have a look into both sides of the argument?
When it comes to intellectual honesty, The Australian, while far from perfect, does pretty well — arguably better than Fairfax. I say that because I’ve found it’s harder to get a letter published in Fairfax criticising its bias than a similar one in The Australian.
George Finlay, Balaclava, Vic
Christianity in denial
WHILE agreeing with John Bunyan’s general proposition that the Bible’s good bits outweigh the bad, I am afraid he is wishful in thinking that “hardly any” Christians and Jews take it as the literal word of God (Letters, 9/8).
Unfortunately, Protestant Christianity bases itself on sola scriptura that implies just that. Martin Luther believed non-believers would go to hell — and so do many Christians today. In fact Christianity in general grounds itself in his doctrine of sola fide (faith alone), which relegates the good deeds Bunyan speaks of, to a kind of optional extra. Luther’s idea of good deeds was expressing a violent hatred of Jews that many historians believe made anti-Semitism viral in Germany and culminated in the Holocaust.
Christianity is in deep denial about this, and many other such anomalies, and it should reprise its theology to accentuate the more humanistic values Bunyan and most of us cherish. Otherwise, if the West were to relapse into poverty, Christianity could easily find itself in much the same predicament as Islam today.
Tom Drake-Brockman, Berrilee, NSW

For our boys: GP Jamal Rifi to tackle radicals

$
0
0

MOST POPULAR STORIES


For our boys: GP Jamal Rifi to tackle radicals

Dr Jamal Rifi - SHARROUF REAX
Islamic community leader Jamal Rifi, with his sons Faisal and Jihad in Sydney, is urging Muslim parents to protect their children from radical influences. Picture: James Croucher
LAKEMBA community leader Jamal Rifi is determined to stop radical Islam from gaining a criminal foothold in the Australian community, and by reaching out to boys just like his own sons, he hopes the war can be won.
The Sydney GP and father of five — including sons Faisal, 27, and Jihad, 16 — plans to run for NSW parliament next year as an independent, on a platform that includes urging Muslim parents to deter their children from falling prey to violent radical influences.
“I’m going to use my interactions with the local community during my election campaign to talk about radicalisation and inform mums and dads about the signs and behavioural changes in young people that parents need to be aware of,” Dr Rifi said.
He said he had been “fearful” that his own children could fall under the influence of radical notions of Islam, such as those promoted by Australian terrorists Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, but talking about the issue had been the key. “In my dealings with them I always express my views that the actions of people like Elomar and Sharrouf are not the actions of Muslims and I encourage them to have discussions about these issues to make sure they are less susceptible to extremist ideologies,” he said.
Dr Rifi is likely to be waging his electoral campaign against one of two men with links to the Muslim community: Bankstown Mayor Khal Asfour or Punchbowl Boys High School principal Jihad Dib, both of whom have been named as potential ALP candidates for Lakemba. Whatever the outcome, Dr Rifi said he still worried about the influence of online radicalism on Muslim youth. The emergence at the weekend of a photograph showing Sharrouf’s young son in Syria holding up a severed human head showed the critical need for action, despite attempts in the community advocating moderation.
“We are proud of what we have achieved — we have distanced our communities from the ideologies of ISIS (now known as the Islamic State) and those like ISIS,” he said. “I think the time past since September 11 has proved us right: two or three incidents is not the worst possible outcome and we should get some credit for that. (But) you don’t get to know your religion from behind a (computer) screen. These kids need mentors.”
Parents needed to be aware of where their children were learning “the teachings of Islam” and the credentials of imams involved in their religious education.
“There are people among us who have dubious credentials who are steering young people away from the ‘middle path’,” Dr Rifi said. “We are actively steering our people away from those with radical ideas but we can’t do this when all the teaching is taking place through the internet.”
Dr Rifi received the government’s Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Award in 2007 for his efforts to improve relations between Muslim and non-Muslim communities and is the founding member of Australian Muslim Doctors Against Violence.
He said Sharrouf’s behaviour was “demented” and vowed to “fight that kind of radicalism”.
“He is not serving anyone but his own ego and delusion and it is impacting negatively on his kids, his community and his religion,” Dr Rifi said.
“People like me are the real representatives of the Muslim community, not Sharrouf and not (Mohamed) Elomar — that is the message I want to send.”
NSW Islamic Council head Khaled Sukkarieh concurred, describing the latest Sharrouf images as “beyond belief”. “To see photos of a seven-year-old being subjected to this kind of rubbish, we condemn it all in the name of Islam,” Mr Sukkarieh said.
He said comments by former army chief Peter Leahy in recent days about Australia being engaged in a 100-year war with Islam pitted communities against each other at a time when the country needed to “stand united”.
“The community itself hurts the most as a result of any action by individuals who may hijack Islam for their own purpose,” he said. “If we are going to achieve anything we need to be working together, not sowing seeds of hate for the next 100 years.”
Islamic Friendship Association spokesman Keysar Trad said those behind the violence were “trying to play some serious psychological games” with Australians. However, he said by reclaiming the language militants used to “glamourise” their violence Australians could make a difference.
“These people are trying to convince the disenfranchised and the disenchanted that they are engaging in some sort of holy war,” Mr Trad said. “We have to say it is an unholy war. If they call themselves jihadists, call them brutal murderers.
“They have nothing to do with Islam and in the midst of all this Muslims outside of ISIS control are opening their homes to Christians and those fleeing brutality; those are the true Muslims.”
Hafiz Muhammed Abdul Wahid, who heads the Tayyiba Institute religious college in Melbourne, said Islamic State’s actions should be condemned “absolutely” by Australian Muslims.
“It doesn’t matter if someone has a different opinion from you, you don’t go and cut (off) their head,” Mr Wahid said.
He described Sharrouf as “a lunatic, a crazy trying to stir up the community spirit”.
“This person does not represent Islam,” he said.
Sydney-based Lebanese Muslim Association spokesman Ahmad Malas said Sharrouf’s actions were “unacceptable from every perspective” and he considered the terrorist guilty of “child abuse”.
However, Mr Malas questioned the responsibility of Australia’s Muslim population to condemn or explain the actions of a few rogue extremists.

aug 9,,,How a regular suburban kid put his faith in a killer cult

$
0
0

How a regular suburban kid put his faith in a killer cult

Writer, TWAM
Sydney
National Security Correspondent
Sydney
Mohammed Elomar professional boxer . Punchbowl 12 5 06 Picture: NICK BLOUKOS
Mohamed Elomar was a promising young boxer on a scholarship before becoming a jihadist.Source: News Limited
Sharrouf in a photograph posted on social media earlier this year.
Sharrouf in a photograph posted on social media earlier this year. Source: Supplied
IT is an unusually warm winter’s afternoon in Sydney’s West. School is out and, at another table in Bankstown’s Golden Bean Cafe, a first-grader is swinging his legs and slurping at a milkshake as his mum attempts to extract information about his day.
Wassim Haddad is sitting across from us, dressed in a dun-coloured shalwar kameez, pulling habitually at his shaggy beard as we drink coffee and he doesn’t. Ramadan, the month of fasting, has just ended but Haddad is abstaining for a further six days because, he explains, come the Day of Reckoning a whole year of sins will be forgiven for his additional days of piety.
We’ve been chatting for a while when he slants his phone screen our way. It’s a video sent by his good mate Khaled Sharrouf, 32, who went to school not far from here at Chester Hill High. Sharrouf, like Haddad, is Australian born, the son of Lebanese migrants. In the video, Sharrouf, a solid, overweight man, is dressed in combat gear and a pair of green fluorescent runners. In his hand he carries a pistol. On the ground in front of him is a row of kneeling men, their hands tied behind their backs with checked keffiyeh scarves. They are Iraqis — possibly soldiers, possibly police, possibly just government workers such as primary school teachers.
Sharrouf walks up behind one of the men and points the pistol at the back of his head as other gunmen do likewise. He stiffens his grip on the pistol and … Haddad angles the screen away. “I think you know what happens next,” he says without any great emotion. We do. Sharrouf, from Wiley Park, Sydney, pulled the trigger and blew the man’s brains out through his face. Then he sent the video to his mates in Sydney.
In the video Sharrouf’s friend Mohamed Elomar, 30, also from Sydney’s west, can be seen limping on crutches. Elomar, who in 2003 was on a boxing scholarship at the Australian Institute of Sport, was shot in the knee a few months earlier. Elomar posted his X-rays to his Twitter account.
“Getting shot in the knee freaking hurts dude,” he tweeted to one of his mates. “It’s like getting hit by a Mack truck.” This is a war where the combatants are also the correspondents.
In December last year, Sharrouf, who is on a terrorism watch list and has had his passport seized, slipped out of Australia using his brother’s passport. Elomar left about the same time. The pair met up in Malaysia and then travelled together to Turkey where they sneaked across the border into Syria to join fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, now known as Islamic State, which is waging a brutal war on two fronts, against Syrian and Iraqi forces, with the aim of establishing an Islamic caliphate, just as the Taliban did in Afghanistan.
Late in July, shortly after Sharrouf’s execution video was taken in Iraq, the pair headed west, returning to Syria, where in a daring manoeuvre the Islamic State forces attacked a Syrian army base, Division 17, near the eastern city of Raqqa. Reports say the attack began when two Saudi suicide bombers simultaneously detonated bombs on the perimeter of the base. There was fierce fighting for many hours before the Islamists overran the base.
This relatively insignificant battle in a long and bloody war may have gone unnoticed by the rest of the world but for what happened next. The Islamic State forces beheaded many Syrian soldiers they had captured. In a macabre ritual reminiscent of medieval times, or an episode of Game of Thrones, the heads were impaled on steel spikes in the town’s main square. Sharrouf took to Twitter. He posted photographs of his grinning mate Elomar holding the heads of two slain men in either hand, like a pair of freshly slaughtered fowl.
In the days after these photos were posted we are sitting in the Golden Bean in Bankstown talking to Haddad. He spoke to Sharrouf just a few hours ago. Sharrouf, he says, is happy, ecstatic. “He says that he loves what he is doing over there,” explains Haddad, who runs the hardline al-Risalah Islamic Centre in Bankstown, which Sharrouf and Elomar had attended.
“He says he is doing the work of Allah in establishing an Islamic caliphate. He is enjoying himself. It is something he has always wanted to do. Why wouldn’t he be happy? He is fulfilling his obligations to Islam. He pretty much called us (other Islamic youth in Sydney) cowards for not being there.” Dozens more would follow, Haddad reckons, but they have had their passports seized by ASIO.
On the outskirts of Sydney at Denham Court there is an enormous house with Arabian horses grazing in the surrounding paddocks. Inside the house lives a good man with a broken heart. His name is Mamdouh Elomar. He and his brothers escaped civil war in Lebanon in the early 1970s and went on to build a very successful engineering business, Lifese Engineering.
The Auburn-based company has worked on projects as diverse as providing the steel work for spires on Sydney’s St Mary’s Cathedral to a contract to build part of the $1.3 billion Gold Coast desalination plant. Former NSW attorney-general John Dowd is the chairman of the company.
Mamdouh Elomar could make a success of business, but he could not steer his two older sons, Ahmed and Mohamed, away from hardline Islamist views.
“He is very shitty with them,” says the family lawyer, Adam Houda, “like big time. But they are interesting guys. Their dad is a very wealthy man and yet they are willing to sacrifice everything to help people, even if it means their life. I find them interesting in that regard. They are set. That is how passionate they are about it.”
In 2007 Ahmed travelled to Lebanon for a holiday where he was arrested for allegedly linking up with a terrorist organisation. He was believed to have been tortured in jail. His father flew to Lebanon and used every connection he had to successfully secure his son’s release. At the time Mamdouh Elomar gave an interview to journalist Taghred Chandab.
In that interview he urged his children to stay away from Sheik Feiz Mohammed and the Global Islamic Youth Centre in Liverpool, Sydney. “Sheiks like Feiz ruin people,” he told Chandab. “He is not a sheik; he is brainwashing all these children. I know my religion, so I can tell him when he is wrong, but these kids believe everything he says and think it’s their religion. Someone needs to stop him.” It didn’t work. It seems their uncle, Mohamed Elomar Sr, had more of an influence on the boys than their father. Mohamed Sr is a convicted terrorist.
He was once a draftsman in the family’s engineering business before becoming involved in radical Islam and assuming the role of ringleader in Australia’s largest ever terrorist plot, known as the Pendennis plot.
Pendennis was a sprawling terror conspiracy involving 18 men in NSW and Victoria. For more than a year NSW and Victorian police, the Australian Federal Police and ASIO monitored the group.
When they swooped in 2005 they found the men had stockpiled 28,000 rounds of ammunition, a dozen guns, chemicals, bomb-making recipes, timers, batteries and a trove of jihadist material including beheading videos and extremist preachings. Eighteen men were convicted and sentenced to lengthy prison terms, including Mohamed Sr, who got 21 years without parole. Sharrouf, considered by police to be a foot-soldier, served three years and nine months. His sentence was drastically reduced because of his mental capacity. He was diagnosed at an early age as “a chronic schizophrenic” probably exacerbated by heavy drug use in his teens.
When the police came for Sharrouf in 2005 he was living in a cul-de-sac, in Sydney’s western suburbs with his wife, Tara Nettleton, an Anglo-Australian, and their three young children. The pair had met at Chester Hill High.
Sharrouf came from a troubled background. When he was in his early teens his father abandoned the family and returned to Lebanon, leaving his mother to care for Khaled and his siblings. At high school Khaled ran with a local gang called the Dandans, according to school friends — he had a string of minor convictions and was a heavy user of amphetamines and LSD. He was expelled for bashing another student in Year 9.
Nettleton, too, was apparently a wild girl at school. Classmates recall her openly talking about having sex and smoking pot at an early age. Sharrouf is two years older. He re-embraced his faith in an attempt to turn his life around. She converted to Islam. People say she took to her new religion with a zealot’s fervour.
The pair married and moved to quiet Bradley Crescent in Wiley Park. Neighbours this week recalled how Sharrouf’s friends would come knocking on the doors at all hours of the night. They also recalled seeing groups of men praying on the lawn in the front yard. Tara could be friendly, they say, but Khaled was aloof and intimidating.
Tara was a pretty woman, but whenever there were men around she would cover up. Joyce Spedding, an elderly woman, who lives next door, says she saw Tara in the front yard one day wearing the all-covering niqab. “I said to her, ‘You’re too pretty to wear those things.’ That was the wrong thing to say. She turned on her heels and went inside and never spoke to me again from that day on.”
For a year police monitored Sharrouf’s every move; they tapped his phone and planted listening devices throughout his house. Former NSW detective Peter Moroney was one of the officers who eavesdropped on the Sharroufs. He says Khaled put considerable pressure on Tara to stop her mother, Karen, from seeing her grandchildren because she was a kafir, a non-Muslim.
Tara’s father, Peter Nettleton, tells us that Karen stayed close to their daughter throughout her marriage to Khaled, and supported her decisions. He says that when Tara was in high school she fell in with the wrong crowd and that Sharrouf helped pulled her out of it.
“That’s how he won her over, by looking after her in the very first instance.”
Peter Nettleton says the family tried to steer Tara away from Khaled, but Tara wasn’t for turning. “She went his way and didn’t want to know us any more. We tried to reach out, but she was — what’s the word I can use? — she was probably possessed. She was brainwashed.”
Nettleton, who is divorced from Karen, hasn’t spoken to his daughter in seven years. Like Mamdouh Elomar, he is a heartbroken father, a stranger to the life his child has chosen. “There’s not a day goes by that I don’t think about it,” he says.
Ten years on, Sharrouf’s neighbours in Bradley Crescent still recall the night police choppers swirled overhead and the street was clogged with patrol cars. They never saw Khaled again and Tara soon moved out with the kids. In sentencing, judge Anthony Whealy made note that Sharrouf’s psychiatrist, Olav Nielssen, thought he was “unlikely to become involved in a further offence of this kind”. Tara wrote a letter to the court saying how she and Khaled had discussed that when he was released they would move to the country to lead a quiet life on a farm and and raise their kids away from trouble. “He just wants to stick to himself and stay out of trouble,” she wrote. It wasn’t to be.
After Sharrouf was released from jail in October 2009, he soon became friendly with the brothers, Ahmed and Mohamed, the nephews of Mohamed Elomar Sr, Sharrouf’s fellow plotter. Lawyer Houda says he would see Sharrouf and the Elomar boys at the Body Punch Gym at Lakemba. The Elomars would box while Sharrouf hit the weights. The Elomars are talented, ferocious fighters, both Australian champions.
Ahmed fought on the undercard on the biggest fight night in Australian history, when Anthony Mundine took on Danny Green at Aussie Stadium. Ahmed made a dramatic entrance to the ring on the back of a white Arabian horse. The boys were also into bull riding.
Friends say Ahmed, the older of the two, is an uncompromising character. “If you gave him your word about something, even something relatively minor, and then you didn’t follow through he would be immensely insulted,” an acquaintance says. “That would be it — he’d have nothing to do with you again. He is hardcore. Intense.” Mohamed, on the other hand, is more laid-back.
Ahmed seems to have been particularly affected by the jailing of his uncle. Mohamed Sr had trained him and his brother. Ahmed regularly turned up to court to hear the proceedings and one day in 2005, outside the courtroom, he told journalist Robert Wainwright that he did not believe the terrorist allegations against his uncle. “My uncle is not like that. It’s upset the whole family. You live in a good country, you’ve got kids, you’ve got jobs. Why would you do something like that?”
But from that point on, he and his brother became increasingly radicalised. And two years later he was arrested in Lebanon, accused of plotting with terrorists. Ahmed was supposedly tortured in a Lebanese jail, but this only seemed to harden his resolve. His brother followed his lead.
In December 2011, Ahmed Elomar and Sharrouf had their vehicle parked-in at a Bankstown parking lot by a local restaurateur. They burst into the restaurant and threatened to shoot the man and burn down his shop. Ahmed then punched him twice in the face and Sharrouf joined in.
And then, in January 2012, Ahmed was at it again, this time with Haddad from the al-Risalah Islamic Centre. A Shia man opened a juice store in Bankstown. According to reports, Haddad and Ahmed Elomar accused him of being a supporter of the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. Haddad demanded he donate money to help the rebels in Syria. When he declined, 20 men, led by Ahmed Elomar, attacked him. Ahmed held him by the throat and said, “We are going to burn the shop down.” Others threatened to cut his throat. The intimidation continued and the man was forced to sell the juice bar, which had cost him $80,000 to set up, for just $10,000.
A few months later Ahmed was seen carrying a placard on a wooden pole — “Our dead are in paradise, your dead are in hell’’ — at a Muslim protest against an online video deriding the Prophet Mohammed. One of his fellow protesters punched a police officer and while he was on the ground Ahmed Elomar smashed him hard over the head with the pole.
He is in jail until March 2016. It was his younger brother, Mohamed, who would go off to fight the holy war to establish a Muslim caliphate on Arab soil.
Houda says he cannot abide the barbaric acts of Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, and that it is un-­Islamic to disrespect the dead. But, he says, they are fulfilling what they believe to be their duty.
“People have been outraged that in the last 20 days a few hundred people have been killed in the Gaza Strip — during that same period 1500 kids were killed in Syria,” he says. “Any sincere person would be outraged. Muslims are taught that if another Muslim is suffering you have to come to their aid and help, because their suffering is your suffering.”
Houda insists that their intentions are pure and that both of them are good men doing what they believe is right.
Haddad says they have rejected what their parents have strived for, a quiet life in Australia.
“The older generation, my parents, they can’t understand,” he says to us in the Golden Bean Cafe. “They say, ‘This country has done everything for you. You get free schooling. You get Centrelink. You get Medicare. You get free health services. You can pray when you want. This country has done everything for you, for us.’
“That generation, they came from war,” he continues. “They fled the fighting. Now they carry with them a defeated mentality. They were called wogs when they arrived and they accepted it because they were defeated. They just wanted to blend in. We don’t see it that way. We have come back to our true religion. It frees us up from that grip of defeat.”
He says the only reason his parents’ generation was let into Australia in the first place was to weaken Muslim countries.
“It was to stop Muslim dominance. But we are rising up. There is a saying in Islam: ‘The youth are the spark of the fire’.”

Aug 9...Jihadist slaughters expose deep hypocrisy over Israel

$
0
0

Jihadist slaughters expose deep hypocrisy over Israel

HOMEGROWN jihadists parading the severed heads of their fellow Muslim conquests in Syria and Iraq should have triggered robust public condemnation from the Grand Mufti and other Muslim community leaders in Australia. Instead, we have heard little until now, when proposed new anti-terror laws have prompted loud objections from Muslim leaders. This is deeply disappointing for a nation eager to tackle terrorism at the same time it fosters an open and tolerant approach to national unity. The double standards at play in this domestic terror debate and the reactions to the Middle East conflict need to be confronted.
This weekend 40,000 Iraqis from minority groups, including Christians, are cowering on a mountain in the north of their country besieged by the barbarous jihadists of the Islamic State. The adherents of this new caliphate have been executing and beheading so-called “unbelievers”. Aside from those hiding, and dying, in the mountains the UN estimates another 200,000 people have fled the region in the face of the jihadist onslaught. Yet the focus for most of the world’s attention for the past week has been not on their plight, or even that of the 170,000 people killed so far in Syria in what is one of the greatest humanitarian catastrophes of the post-WWII era, but on the death and destruction in Gaza and, invariably, Israel’s perceived responsibility for it. Thus on a weekend when there was international uproar over a strike on a UN-run school in Gaza that killed 10 people, three of them members of Islamic Jihad, there was little mention of the fact that, at the same time, 1800 people were killed in Syria, 130 of them, including seven children and 10 women, dying in one day alone at the hands of Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship.
Outrage such as that expressed over the UN school strike is justified (UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon termed it “a moral outrage and criminal act”). This newspaper’s consistent view is that Israel should be no more immune to criticism than Hamas and the jihadists when it is responsible for such civilian carnage. But the latest rerun of the Gaza conflict and the response to it shows rank hypocrisy in the Islamic world and much of the Western media. As a prominent Egyptian commentator has noted; “Muslim killing Muslim or Arab killing Arab seems more acceptable than Israel killing Arabs.” The consequence of this is seen not just in the preoccupation with Gaza and attempts to haul Israel before the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes. Such moves come at a time when 1600 people were killed in Iraq in July alone, 1800 people died in Syria in the space of a few days, and 3000 victims have been killed in attacks by Boko Haram jihadists in Nigeria. Yet such atrocities elicit none of the outrage directed at Israel. No matter how much grief and horror we feel over the civilian casualties of Gaza, we also know Israel has the right and obligation to protect its citizens from persistent and indiscriminate Hamas rocket attacks. Yet Israel is the fashionable villain, not Hamas and not even Islamic State.
To his credit, Barack Obama has now intervened to help the hapless Iraqis besieged on the mountain, with food drops and air strikes. But where, through all the horrors of Syria, Iraq and Boko Haram’s murderous rampage in Nigeria in the name of Islam, has there been anything like the outrage that has been seen around the world over Israel’s action against Hamas in Gaza? The vituperation of those like the former Fairfax Media columnist Mike Carlton has, as always, been directed at the perceived iniquities of Israel, never those of Hamas or the egregious acts of inhumanity being committed across the Arab world. In Pakistan, a leading Islamic state, an army offensive against terrorists in its tribal districts began in mid-June. More than 1500 civilians have been killed, many of them women and children. Yet there is no international uproar.
Demonstrators regularly take to our streets to protest against Israel’s actions in Gaza, yet fall silent on atrocities committed in Iraq, even when our own citizens take part. The threat posed by the 150 homegrown jihadists fighting in Iraq and Syria, like Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, is appallingly real. But it is Jewish schoolchildren who are disgracefully targeted for racial vilification and Nazi-style abuse on a bus in Sydney.
The Jewish state is a Western-style liberal democracy, so we are right to expect more of it, and impose the highest standards. And because of its openness it is vulnerable to strident criticism from abroad and from its own citizens. This should be seen as a strength rather than a weakness. But increasingly Israel’s critics are allowing themselves to be led down a dangerous path to a familiar version of anti-semitism, where the root of all the world’s ills, and certainly those in the Arab world, is seen to be Zionism. In doing so, they allow themselves to be aligned with outfits such as Hamas, whose despicable tactics show less regard than Israel for the lives of Palestinian children. We should have no truck with Israel’s worst enemies.

Peace under Islam requires submission

$
0
0

Peace under Islam requires submission


“MUSLIMS are all terrorists.”
“No, no: Islam is a religion of peace.”
While these wild oversimplifications continue to be bandied about (mostly by non-Muslims), violence racks the Middle East, South Asia and much of Africa in the name of Islam. Meanwhile, many Muslims, like their neighbours of other outlooks, recoil in horror.
A few basic facts will help us all, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, get past the stereotypes to understand the history of Islam and the events that alarm us here and abroad.
First, Islam is indeed a religion of peace, but in a crucially qualified sense. The root word of both “Islam” and “Muslim” is “s-l-m”, which is also the root for “salaam” or “peace” — but it most basically means “submission” (to God).
So peace will be achieved by the rule of God extending over the world. It is the peace of a single ideology and a single regime, the peace of an empire united around one God and one faith. That global peace has not arisen yet, because the world is still divided into two realms: dar al-Islam, where people live in submission to God, and dar al-Harb, the abode of war, where non-Muslims do not yet submit to the beneficent reign of Allah. Once Islam triumphs over the whole world, humanity will have global peace.
Second, Islam’s scriptures forbid forcible conversion. “There must be no compulsion in religion,” says the Koran. Unbelievers are always given a choice: exile or conversion. (Christians and Jews, “people of the book”, traditionally are given the choice to remain under Muslim rule and to remain in their traditions, albeit as second-class citizens. But not all Islamic regimes have extended that privilege to them.)
Third, Islam’s scriptures not only allow for, but in some places encourage, the use of force. The so-called sword verses of the Koran in particular encourage believers to fight to defend the faith and the faithful community, and subdue enemies of the faith. Muslim scholars have long disputed the interpretation and application of these verses. At one extreme are those who preach them as the chief duty of Muslims who feel embattled or aggressive. At the other are liberal Muslims who doubt their authenticity, particularly in the face of many other verses in the Koran that advocate peace. But every educated Muslim knows that the sword verses are there.
Fourth, the general expectation of Islam since Muhammad’s day is that the reign of God (which is to say, the reign of Islamic regimes) would extend steadily over the whole earth. And that ­extension, again since Muhammad’s day, was achieved sometimes by diplomacy and persuasion, yes, but also sometimes through military action. One cannot understand Islamic history without acknowledging the frequent resort to armed force in extending the “house of Islam”.
(The collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the ending of the caliphate in the early 20th century thus was a tremendous blow to Islamic identity. How could God’s forces be defeated? The ­recent attempt by Islamic State to restore the caliphate is a call to ­resume the global agenda of expansionist Islam.)
Finally, it must be acknowledged that very few religions in the world are strictly and uniformly nonviolent. Jains in India and Mennonites and Quakers in the West can claim to be “religions of peace”.
But almost all of the major world religions have offered legitimations and even incitements to violence: from ancient Israel conquering Canaan to Constantine and Charlemagne ruling Christian empires in the Middle Ages, with Buddhists, Hindus, and Muslims fighting each other in South Asia while priests of various religions have blessed Chinese, Korean and Japanese armies.
And, lest the New Atheists draw any comfort from such a summary, let’s recall that secularist regimes were largely responsible for the bloodiest century on record, the last one. So, surprise, surprise: human beings find impressive banners under which to fight wherever we are, whatever our objectives.
It is up to all of us, therefore, whatever our views, to find the resources in our respective traditions to achieve justice and peace, and encourage those in other traditions who are trying hard to do the same.
John G Stackhouse jr, Sangwoo Youtong Chee professor of theology and culture at Regent College, Vancouver, Canada, visited Australia to give lectures at The Scots College, Sydney.

Plenty of room for more people

$
0
0
Economics Correspondent
Sydney

Plenty of room for more people

ADAM CREIGHTON
DICK Smith is a great Australian businessman and patriot, but on the question of population Smith continues to beat the wrong drum.
A small Australia is a stagnant, sterile Australia. Only by increasing skilled immigration significantly can Australia hope to increase its productivity and entrepreneurial and innovative cap­acity, and also remain a respectable size against our rapidly growing competitors in Asia.
Smith is probably right to support Andrew Forrest’s tough welfare reforms: breaking the vicious circle of dependency and joblessness in white let alone Aboriginal communities will require a lot more than tweaking the withdrawal rates or renaming handouts. But he is wrong on immigration.
If Australia had the density of an India or China, claims that more people would undermine Australians’ living standards might have credibility.
It is ­astounding in a nation with arable land as vast as Australia, where so many citizens have flown between Melbourne or Sydney or Brisbane on a clear day and simply looked down, that claims of environmental degradation are taken seriously.
From Thomas Malthus in the 19th century to Paul Ehrlich’s failed bet with Julian Simon in the 20th century that the world would run out of resources, economists predicting environmental or economic doom from rapid population growth have been continually proved wrong. Free markets, prices and the exigencies of the age have combined to lift agricultural and industrial productivity dramatically to protect living standards. There is no good reason why that process will not continue.
A bigger population reduces the fixed cost of government administration; a bigger benefit stems from economies of scale in industry and infrastructure. The Greens are either hypocrites or fools to advocate high-speed rail between Sydney and Melbourne while at the same time insisting on a “sustainable” population, typically code for small. Such mass transit projects within or between cities are only possible with large populations.
But in the 21st century the best argument for more people and even for higher-density living is the increased probability of mutually beneficial social or economic exchanges between individuals, households and communities that ultimately come to enrich the rest of society, too. People exposed to more diverse ideas are more likely to innovate.
Thankfully, as Smith pointed out this week, Australia is already enjoying rapid population growth without much political complaint. Australia’s natural increase has hovered around 130,000-150,000 a year for the past 20 years. But net overseas immigration has averaged about 225,000 a year since 2006, giving Australia one of the fastest rates of population growth in the advanced world.
The internecine asylum-seeker debate hasn’t poisoned Australians’ apparent acceptance of large-scale formal immigration, ­either. The government in Britain, a country with almost three times Australia’s population, is trying to cap net annual immigration below 100,000 a year to satisfy growing anti-EU sentiment.
But if Australia wants to be more than a quarry and a farm, then we need the sorts of people who will innovate and invent. Large swathes of Australia’s permanent immigrants, however, are not skilled.
Of the abovementioned net immigration, only about 50,000 are skilled migrants, a number the government expects to remain broadly flat up to 2018. Permanent “family reunion” immigration, meanwhile, is about 38,000 a year.
The potential pool of talented immigrants is stymied by a so-called “skilled occupations list” — a laughable attempt to plan the jobs market by federal bureaucrats who naturally have very little inherent ability or incentive to predict accurately what type and how many jobs the economy will require.
It should be scrapped immediately in place of far broader indicators of suitability, such as age and levels of education.
Chefs, sonographers, fitters and turners, and psychologists are in; but too bad if you’re a piano teacher, a personal trainer — or simply a literate, healthy, industrious young person capable or working in the vast range of low-skilled fields the retail and service sector has generated — you’re out. Barristers and solicitors are even on the desirable list, as if we need to be encouraging the relentless legalisation of civil society.
It should be obvious that individuals themselves are in the best position to judge how and where they might be useful in an economy, having far greater incentive to make the correct decision than officials in Canberra.
Some of the most rapid population bursts in human history have occurred, peacefully, in Australia without massive inflation or unemployment.
The 1850s gold rush saw the population triple in about a decade. More recently, Australia’s rapidly growing population has been the country’s economic secret weapon.
Australia lost and is still losing a huge opportunity to increase the number of young educated people. If only we had stimulated our economy with university-educated, unemployed Europeans and Americans during the global fin­ancial crisis rather than borrowing billions of dollars at 6 per cent to build school halls.
Smith was right this week about the pervasive obsession with GDP growth, though, which too many economists see as an end in itself rather than an artificial statistical byproduct of ­prosperity.

B SALT: 15.3,12 Fear and theories collide as population debate refuses to die

$
0
0

Fear and theories collide as population debate refuses to die

Social Editor
I WANT to introduce you to a bold and brave thinker.
His name is Thomas Malthus. He was a minister in the Church of England who wrote and published prolifically on the subject of population a little more than 200 years ago.
He gave his name to a term that prevails to this day: Malthusian, which has come to mean calamitous.
Malthus argued that since the planet's resources are finite, but that the population's capacity for growth is exponential (can increase at an increasing rate), there must be natural corrections known as Malthusian catastrophes.
Initially, Malthus favoured the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse -- war, pestilence, famine and disease -- as agents of demographic correction, although in later publications the good minister enthusiastically advocated sexual abstinence as a way of keeping population growth in hand.
Malthus's thinking was bold because it ran counter to the prevailing orthodoxy: that there were more or less no limits to growth and to the potential improvement of man and society.
Malthus was writing at a time when great land discoveries and settlement programs in the New World were under way.
For those predisposed to biblical metaphors, and who isn't, there is plenty to choose from in this debate.
For Population Growthists there is God's very own advice to "be fruitful and multiply".
For the disciples of Malthus, there is "repent now and abstain to avert eternal damnation later", or words to the effect.
Malthus's thinking kicked around in subsequent decades and centuries.
Indeed, some argue that Malthus influenced the work of the evolutionist Charles Darwin, who published his theories in the middle of the 19th century.
But in demographic terms, it wasn't until the late 20th century that Malthus's thinking got another airing. Not that it was recognised as Malthusian logic at the time; it was given a makeover by the US academic Paul Ehrlich, who published The Population Bomb in 1968.
Ehrlich was an entomologist who had studied the rise and fall of insect colonies; his leap across to human populations followed a similar logic.
The human population (then at four billion) was too high and this would lead in the 1970s to famine, disease and social unrest.
Not quite the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, but close enough to qualify as a Malthusian resurrection.
It is fair to say that Ehrlich was, and remains, the darling of the anti-growth movement in the US and beyond.
However, his reputation took a battering in the early 80s when Julian Simon, an English academic working in the US, challenged the Malthus-Ehrlich idea that resource depletion limits population growth.
In his book The Ultimate Resource (1981), Simon argued that as a resource diminishes, the price rises, prompting exploration and recovery of additional reserves or substitutes, which ultimately reduce the cost of the resource.
Ehrlich, of course, rejected Simon's thesis and dismissed him as a fringe player.
This led to a famous wager. Simon bet Ehrlich ($US1000) that the price of a basket of five scarce commodities would ultimately fall during the 80s; Ehrlich bet the price would rise because of scarcity. Ehrlich chose the basket: copper, chromium, nickel, tin and tungsten. The price of the basket of scarce commodities fell by 57 per cent over the decade to October 1990. Ehrlich conceded and paid up.
Simon's book was reportedly an influence on the Danish academic Bjorn Lomborg who, like Malthus, challenged the prevailing orthodoxy with regard to population and resources. But instead of challenging the growthists, Lomborg, like Simon, challenged the Malthusianist's view of the world.
Lomborg published The Skeptical Environmentalist in 2001 and in which , through the bold use of evidence and data, he credibly refuted many of the claims of imminent environmental calamity, indeed of the Malthusian catastrophe.
In the same vein as Lomborg is British journalist and author Matt Ridley who published The Rational Optimist in 2010, which argues that when viewed from the altitude of the broad sweep of history, the quality of life for more and more people is improving as the world population increases.
The most powerful point that I think Ridley makes is that the population is stabilising naturally without the interventions imagined by Malthus, or Ehrlich for that matter. Ridley cites the birth rate in Bangladesh as evidence: down from 6.8 per woman in 1955 to 2.7 today.
As the standard of living improves, as education rates rise, as the spread of Western values, culture and attitudes to women pervade the mostly non-Muslim world, the rate of population growth subsides.
That is Ridley's contribution and in many ways it was also Simon's point.
The question that so perplexed and so motivated Simon, Lomborg and Ridley is the same. Why is it that when predictions of Malthusian catastrophe fail to materialise, there isn't a fundamental reconsideration of the proposition?
Ehrlich's lost wager did not cultivate a different point of view; it proved nothing.
Indeed it could be argued that the current green orthodoxy of an impending global calamity -- of biblical proportions -- that will befall us all if corrective action is not immediately implemented is an extension of Ehrlich's 1968 thesis: that the world cannot sustain current, let alone future, populations. And yet the battle rages on vehemently.
Lomborg, Ridley and Simon are all short-sighted lackeys of big business; Malthus and Ehrlich are air-headed alarmists who fail to appreciate the inherent ingenuity and resourcefulness of mankind.
The easy conclusion to draw is that the truth probably lies somewhere in between.
But I think both arguments miss the point.
The more worthy debate is the argument put forward by Marxists that in fact it's not about resource depletion -- it should be about the efficient, and fair distribution and allocation of resources.
There is enough food and energy on the planet to feed and support seven billion: it's just that neither are equitably distributed.
And yet oddly as the world careens towards 10 billion, I cannot help but wonder whether Malthus wasn't right all those years ago -- that something will check the population or, and this is also a possibility, there is an inherent market for fear of over-crowding in the psychological make-up of mankind.
Malthus tapped into this fear and so too did Ehrlich, and it still prevails no matter what evidence to the contrary might be put forward by the likes of Simon, Lomborg or Ridley.
Bernard Salt is a KPMG Partner and an adjunct professor at Curtin Business School

LINKS 1 sent Tom Elliott aug 11

$
0
0
From:g87
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:19 AM
Subject: Just remember – every step you take – every move you make - someone is listening to correct you!


  • Hi Tom
  • I was thinking about you – and your soto – voce comments last week about ‘the settlements’  - hidden behind the sophistry of ‘’ISRAEL MAKES MISTAKES!
  • Just how does one counter that in one line?
  • Geoff
  • Just remember – every step you take – every move you make -  someone is listening to correct you!
  • Regards
  • GS
  •  August (6)
  • ITEM 2 sent to tom E Aug 11

    $
    0
    0
     
     
    From:g87
    Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:19 AM
    Subject: THIS IS A PRIVATE ESSAY TOM! to be published in the weeks ahead edited gs
     

    August (2)
     
      July (3)
     
     
     
     
    • ###############################################################################

    The epitome of evil: 'Equality'  of ideas!


    Kate McClintock's view towards the end of the esteemed Paul Murray Live SkyNews current affairs programme on Wednesday 6 August was enlightening.
    The Sydney Morning columnist thought that the sacking of 'stablemate' Mike Carlton was
    " a shame because we need a wide - range of views"

    This arguably asinine idea is  ensconced in the world of the socialist twitterers. Claiming shamelessly the discreditable theology of the new Trotskyites; the  tomato / watermelon green types.
    It has it that all is well so long as all views and debates - ANY views / debates - can be had. 

    Manipulation of mainstream values and ‘International Humanitarian Law’
    It is worse than merely the claimed equality of ideas. The egalitarians plainly manipulate mainstream values, ensconsing their favourite manifesto - denying the most basic parameter of democratic values.
    Self defence against avowed murderous enemies.
    The collective do not even bother to hide even their so – called moderates’ intentions. it is writ large in all their constitutions. The unqualified murder of Jews and the destruction of the Jewish state.
    Pathetically the twiterati imply that Israel has essentially no right of self defence unless she uses pea shooters or any of their decadent weapons of waffle.
    Using the ‘hoary – nonsense’ theorem of so called International Humanitarian Law as a strategic chimera. It is a tragic farce and everyone should understand it as such. Very few do: even so – called ‘friends’ of Israel are shocked by the simple dichotomy of hiding of modern terror and the publishing ad nauseum the propagandised public face of the reaction via  war.
    One would think in a sophisticated world intelligent humane analysis of self - defence over decades of unremitting provocation could be used by political enemies.
    But what has the Jewish state tolerated?  Murder of her citizenry by a recognized terrorist group. Over decades.
     How dare McC agree that this is a matter of public debate? And encourage Carlton to depict the Middle East's only democracy as a Nazi caricature? Surely itis the ultimate obscenity. It is far more subtle than that: commentators will dismiss Kate M’s views. Whitewashing  by the wilfully ignorant or hapless McClintock via her quote above will barely rate in the 10 second news grab.
    I ask: would McC be game enough to postulate via her ''wide - range of views" the debating idea that the Nazi's should have murdered more than six million of my brethren? Because her mealy - mouthed  support for Carlton is essentially the same theme! We are not far from this!
    Tiny Israel bullied because she can defend herself
    Israel should use pea shooters in response to those avowed to her destruction? Never in the history of warfare has a country [capable of instantly obliterating antagonists] sent warning leaflets and made telephone calls to enemy citizenry asking them to evacuate before commencing military action.
    Never has a country been so careful to consider enemy citizenry, conducted a very limited war at the cost of lives of her own soldiers. This is the way of Israel – yet she has been lacerated via the chimera of the left’s disturbing wilfull ignorance which has long ago been plainly evil.
    Oh - but the 'proportionality' religion is raised by the twirps of  'la -  la land’ who plainly do not care or understand that Hamas set up their activities in civilian areas.
    And that is a war crime.
    Fraud of the left’s plaything: International Law
    Indeed it could be postulated that Carlton must be aware of the manifest failures of new / old proletariat.
    So he and the cadres - the remnants of communism have pathetically picked on Jews and democratic Israel to compensate for the manifest failures of all derivations of the earlier class struggle or their green socialism.
    LO! Hitler claimed to be a socialist and green!

    Hitler and the socialist dream - The Independent

    Israel being blamed for failures of socialist revolution
    All values of the cultural revolution have been denounced / proven since the fall of the Berlin wall. Yet the decadent dialectical materialists  Dialectical materialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    care not in shamelessly  daring to extend the 'debate' to the nether -  Nazi - type comparison of that Carlton cartoon and the outrageous articles that have disgraced The Herald over the years.
    Salami tactics
    There is so much of this slanderous, visceral hatred expressed by the utopian -  dystopians! Indeed media spinners have been using the infamous 'salami' tactics ever since the Ruskies coined the phrase. With the considered help of the useful idiots.

    Contemplate  the heroic defence of Israel during the uniquely – successful Six day war of June 1967.
    Who would have thought that Sydney University's denizens of  Peace and conflated studies (no typo!)  have officially declared that anti semitism is  OK?
    May the lackeys of the illiberal left espouse their liberation theology by taking a long march with all the Leninist  useless idiots and practice their liberalism somewhere in Gaza?
    Maybe they will turn out like Alan Juohnston. He certai]nly has changed his BBC - tune since he was kidnapped
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Johnston

    Finally an analysis of Labor politicians and TV host Paul Murray.
    Tony Burke Federal Shadow Minister was also on Paul Murray Live. [6/8]
    His comments are a plain indicator that he does not 'get it' either. I am being generous: he is trying to retain his West Sydney seat!

    Paul Murray was brilliant - as he was the night before.
    As he frequently is - with one exception!

    Indeed Michael Kroger was great as well.
    He is a former President of the Victorian Liberal Party. and is blessed with a brilliant mind.

    Richo had his own programme the hour before: he is still trying to defend his shallow attack on Israel.

    Richardson does not even care that the cartoon that adorned his article in THE OZ was worse than Carlton's!
    I do not know how THE OZ allowed the reproduction of a cartoon depicting the PM Julia gillard being strangled with a Star Of David with parliament burning in the background!

    Geoff Seidner



  • Socialist Dystopia: Loebbecke; responsa re cartoon

    socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/2013/.../loebbecke-responsa-re-cartoon.ht...

    Mar 28, 2013 - What a disgusting, anti-Semitic cartoon! As if it isn't bad enough to portray Gillard as a vicious vulture (no one will get the Phoenix thing) ...
  • cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../cartoon-attacked-sat-19-januar...

    Jan 21, 2013 - I WOULD like to express my extreme disappointment in your publication of the cartoon accompanying the article on Julia Gillard. I feel the ...
  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: The Guardian: Julia Gillard ...

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../the-guardian-julia-gillard-speec...

    Jan 2, 2013 - Cognate Socialist Dystopia. Herein I store essentially ... The Guardian: Julia Gillard speech prompts dictionary to change 'misogyny' definition. Julia Gillard .... SANS CENSORED CARTOON LOEBBECKE!!! Ergas: Deceptive ...
  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: SMH: Misogyny definition to ...

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../smh-misogyny-definition-to-ch...

    Jan 2, 2013 - Cognate Socialist Dystopia ... SMH: Misogyny definition to change afterGillard speech .... SANS CENSORED CARTOON LOEBBECKE!
  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: LETTERS Last post, January 10

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../letters-last-post-january-10.htm...

    Jan 10, 2013 - Cognate Socialist Dystopia ... We must thank Julia Gillard for breaking her promise and ... SANS CENSORED CARTOON LOEBBECKE!



    ########################################################################################################################################################################################################################

  • SEE BELOW QUOTE FROM BDS ENTITY REES... CUT AND PASTE FROM ABOVE LINK!

    Socialist Dystopia: How evil Greens, Academics BDS valley

    https://www.google.com.au/#q=socialistdystopia+antisemitism


    1. Cognate Socialist Dystopia: geoff seidner lynch refuse to ...

      cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../geoff-seidner-lynch-refuse-to-s...

      Nov 1, 2013 - geoff seidner lynch refuse to sign on anti semitism .geoff seidner lynch refuse to ... Socialist Dystopia: How evil Greens, Academics BDS valley.

    2. http://www.icjs-online.org/index.php?article=4388




  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: letters 31/10 Anti-Semitism ...

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../letters-3110-anti-semitism-com...

    Nov 1, 2013 - There is no other tool than anti-Semitism for criticising Israel and the ... THE recent anti-Semitic attack in Sydney is shocking, but comes as no ...
  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: letters 4/11 Anti-Semitism test etc

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../letters-411-anti-semitism-test-et...

    Nov 5, 2013 - Besides Israel, who else are you boycotting? Syria has killed more Palestinians in the past year than Israel. Hamas killed more Palestinians in ...
  • Cognate Socialist Dystopia: 30/10 the oz Dangerous anti ...

    cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../3010-oz-dangerous-anti-semitis...

    Nov 1, 2013 - The culprits were not hardened extremists but Young Labor activists from the Left, which suggests anti-Semitism has crept into small-l liberal ..
     
  • ’Professor Rees dismissed their action in emails obtained by The Australian as "childish, thoughtless, but easily populist".
  • selective cut and paste from above link:
    ''MORE than 40 members of the federal opposition banded together yesterday to sign the London Declaration on Combating Anti-Semitism after they were incensed by comments from the head of the Sydney Peace Foundation, Stuart Rees, attacking the document.
    The Australian yesterday reported Professor Rees had lashed Julia Gillard for signing the declaration, calling the gesture "childish, thoughtless but easily populist".
    Professor Rees is on the staff of the university's Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies - which supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement that explicitly equates Israel with apartheid-era South Africa.
    The Prime Minister last month became the first Australian politician to sign the declaration.
    She was joined last week by opposition frontbencher Christopher Pyne.
    Professor Rees dismissed their action in emails obtained by The Australian as "childish, thoughtless, but easily populist".
    ensconce
    ɪnˈskɒns,ɛn-/
    verb
    gerund or present participle: ensconcing
    1. establish or settle (someone) in a comfortable, safe place.
      "Agnes ensconced herself in their bedroom"
  • ITEM 3 sent to tom ex JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY

    $
    0
    0

    Deceptive photo could create climate of revenge

    $
    0
    0

    Deceptive photo could create climate of revenge

    THE reality of Australians for Palestine lobby group’s grubby distortions to further their demonisation campaign against Israel is more pressure on our Jewish community (“Activists’ Gaza deception”, 28/8). Security and intelligence services are already overstretched due to saturation coverage of the Gaza conflict.
    These are the sort of photos that create hatred and inspire revenge. There are some members of society who will react in anger.
    The increase in anti-Semitism is at an all-time high because there are many in our society who do not differentiate between what happens in the volatile Middle East involving Israelis and Palestinians with members of the Jewish diaspora in Australia.
    This Palestinian propaganda stunt places in doubt everything else that is disseminated by their lobby groups. Well done to Liberal MP Luke Simpkins for being so alert and having the courage to take on this highly emotional issue
    Michael Burd, Toorak, Vic
    YOUR newspaper reported that Australians for Palestine were taking advantage of tragic child victims in Syria to blame Israel for atrocities committed in Gaza. In an earlier posting to our email lists, I inadvertently used an image of dead children in Syria when I was intending to show children killed by Israel in Gaza.
    When the error was pointed out by a handful of people, I apologised to them for my error, and I apologise now.
    Events overtook me and the correction email was never sent to our lists. There was no intention to deceive as is clear from my response to Liberal MP Luke Simpkins.
    It was the picture that was wrong, not the report about Israel’s slaughter of Palestinian children.
    Children slaughtered anywhere is cause for grief. Most people do not want to see the horrific images. However, when people are being bombarded as the Palestinians certainly were by Israeli bombs, we should report on the outrages as best we can.
    Those who wish to make mileage out of some wrong images being used cannot negate the realities on the ground in Gaza. They are well documented by the media, medical teams working there and organisations such as Amnesty International. The statistics alone speak for the horrors and devastation that Israel has caused the Palestinian people.
    Sonja Karkar, Australians for Palestine, Melbourne, Vic
    ACTIVIST group Australians for Palestine used fraudulent propaganda believing it was justified in support of their cause and that of terrorist group Hamas. Meanwhile, Australian Muslims are travelling to join terrorists overseas and Muslim groups are opposed to counter-terrorism laws when 77 per cent of Australians are in favour, thus isolating themselves from the mainstream.
    As Isaac Newton showed, every action has an equal and opposite reaction; extremism breeds extremism. Australia is dividing.
    Iain Rae, River Heads, Qld
    IT IS regrettable that Australians for Palestine wrongly used a photograph of dead Syrian children as images of Palestinian children killed by Israeli bombing. From your report, one understands the purpose of the picture was to expose the horror of Israel’s actions on the children of Gaza.
    It would be a tragedy if this unfortunate incident obscures the fact that more than 2000 Gazans have been killed in this latest conflict.
    Bill Mathew, Parkville, Vic
    THE federal government is keen to legislate to prevent jihadists repatriating with impunity. Very well. But if the onus of proof is reversed, the jihadists will have won and undermined our democracy. And a law for one must apply for all, including for example, to Australians returning from service with Israel’s defence forces. Otherwise, such a law will be unfair.
    David Faber, Adelaide, SA
    GREENS leader Christine Milne displayed ignorance of international affairs and security matters when she said Australia had no business intervening in Iraq.
    Heaven help us (and the world) should the Greens ever win power, or again have the sort of influence they wielded over the Rudd-Gillard governments. Someone should drum into her that burying her head in the sand will not stop jihadists from separating it from her torso should their dreams of a caliphate not be stopped.
    Gerry Carman, Keysborough, Vic

    #1 MY EMAIL TO PM OF HUNGARY: ''YOU ARE DEPENDENT ON THE TOILET TAX''

    $
    0
    0
     
     
     
    From:g87
    Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:49 PM
    Subject: MY dear Prime Minister Orban, Manager Mc Donalds Hungary
     
    MY dear Prime Minister Orban and McDonalds Hungary

     
    We have just returned from a 6 week overseas trip to Europe and Israel.
     
    First return since the revolution of 1956: Sorry we left without the usual formalities.
     
    I managed to get into the wars with your ubiquituous TOILET TAX – it is everywhere.
    Charges vary from EU1 down to nearly $1!
     
    Upon our arrival by train from Austria I needed to ‘go’ – and was trying to gain entry to the little room – and was physically manhandled by the female which in charge of the MENS!
    I complained to no avail to the pair of policemen – that I had no local currency [we were picked up by a relative] – but the young copper ventured the idea that this remnant of femalehood could shoot me! *****
    The police person contemplated this scenario without concern – though he complemented my older person’s mastery of Hungarian after these years.
     
    I asked whether she was armed – got the negative. Really!
    Pathetic way to introduce me to my place of birth after these 5 and .6 decades!
     
    Now I ask you questions.
     
    1. What if I start another revolution / new party demanding repeal of the toilet. tax? THE TOILET TEA PARTY WE WILL CALL IT!? Would you send the NKVD to get me?
    2. How many billions do you raise from this inequity? Will you allow my incipient party to share the tax?
    3. Is it not time you came clean with MCDONALDS in admitting that the TOILET TAX should be openly added to the BIG MAC BURGER’S PRICE? It is an international commodity, you know!
    4. DO YOU REALIZE THAT MCDONALDS – at the same  RAILWAY STATION – is complicit in this fraud in charging the TOILET TAX?
    5. I will write to HUNGARIAN MCDONALDS AND GET THEM TO ADMIT THIS ANOMALY!
    6. I hope you develop the appropriate tools – political and otherwise – to deal with the NAZIS. I found no direct or indirect trace of them amongst the delightful Magyars on your streets of Budapest
     
    ****I think the date was July 4...my / our initial entry to BUDAPEST for 57 years!
     
    Regards
    Geoff Seidner
    13 Alston Gr
    Melbourne
    East St Kilda 3183
    Australia
     
     

    Contacts

    THE PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE

    Postal address: 1357 Budapest, Pf. 6.
    Phone: +36-1-795-6978
    Fax: +36-1-795-0381
    E-mail:
    titkarsag@me.gov.hu
     
     
     
     



    This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.

    'Hamas acting same as ISIS' suggests Israel's Labor party Secretary General

    $
    0
    0

    'Hamas acting same as ISIS' suggests Israel's Labor party Secretary General

    Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    Broadcast: 03/09/2014
    Reporter: Chris Uhlmann
    Hamas is from the same family as Islamic State and a coalition is required to tackle terrorism in the Middle East argues the Secretary General of Israel's Labor party.

    Transcript

    CHRIS UHLMANN, PRESENTER: Another bloody act has been written in the macabre internet theatre of Islamic State terrorists.

    Freelance journalist Steven Sotloff was reporting on the Syrian Civil War when he disappeared in August last year.

    He emerged a fortnight ago in a chilling video, kneeling at the feet of a hooded thug who'd just beheaded fellow American James Foley.

    The warning was clear: Steven Sotloff would die if the United States didn't call a halt to air strikes.

    Last week, his mother, Shirley Sotloff, begged for her son's life.

    SHIRLEY SOTLOFF: I ask you to please release my child. As a mother, I ask your justice to be merciful and not punish my son for matters he has no control over. I ask you to use your authority to spare his life and to follow the example set by the Prophet Muhammad, who protected people of the book. I want what every mother wants: to live to see her children's children. I plead with you to grant me this.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Her pleas went unheeded. Another video was posted overnight. In it, Steven Sotloff is butchered.

    TONY ABBOTT, PRIME MINISTER: This just demonstrates that we are dealing with pure evil. This is a hideous movement that not only does evil, it revels in evil, it exalts in evil and it abundantly justifies what Australia and other countries are doing to assist people who are threatened by this murderous rage, to protect people who are at risk from this murderous rage.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Prime Minister Tony Abbott has authorised Australian planes to carry weapons to the Kurds fighting the Islamic State terrorists in northern Iraq, but it's just one battle in the Middle East, a region that is aflame from end to end. From bomb attacks in Egypt to the Civil War in Syria, the body count rises by the day, and while the war has ended in Gaza, there is an uneasy and fragile peace. 

    Hilik Bar is secretary general of Israel's Labour Party and Deputy Speaker of the Knesset. He joined me from Canberra. 

    Hilik Bar, welcome to 7.30.

    HILIK BAR, SECRETARY GENERAL, LABOR PARTY: Thank you so much.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: The last Iraq war saw Iran emerge as the dominant power in the region and a proliferation of terrorist groups. How could we possibly know what will happen after another intervention by the United States and its allies?

    HILIK BAR: We cannot know, but we don't have a chance - we don't have another choice to make, actually. I think that Israel, who stand at the front of fighting terror, have to have a coalition together with Australia, together with the US and Europe, understanding that there is extreme, fundamentalistic Islamic jihad elements that want to live here, not next to us, to us, to you and us, but instead of us. And I think we have to make a joint effort against terror and we don't have any other choice.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Is it helpful that Israel's Prime Minister says that Hamas and ISIS are branches of the same poison tree when one day you're going to have to negotiate with Hamas?

    HILIK BAR: No, I think that the Prime Minister of Israel is right. By the way, I'm from the Israeli Opposition; it's not natural and obvious for us to support the Prime Minister or to say that he's right. But Hamas is acting the same as ISIS is doing in other countries. You see the executions of people in the middle of Gaza, you see the unacceptable behaviour, the shooting missiles on civilians in Israel. They are belonging to the same family - again, the family that want to live here instead of us, instead of Israeli, instead of Australians. They don't respect and not acknowledge any other way of life but their own and I think that it's sometimes hard to see that they are cut from the same tree, but it's actually, unfortunately, the truth. By the way, as for speaking with Hamas, we will happily speak with Hamas if Hamas will do what Fatah did 20 years ago and that is to understand that we can live here next to each other, to understand you cannot eliminate Israel and you cannot make us go away from here. I remind you that Fatah were a terror group many years ago and they made the shift that Hamas will have to do if it want Israel and other parts of the world to speak with Hamas.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: But can you live next to each other? We've just seen the war in Gaza and has that done real damage to Israel's international standing?

    HILIK BAR: Yeah, but not all the Palestinians are Hamas. I remind you that President Abbas and other factions in the Palestinian politic recognise Israel trying to negotiate with us. I prove - I also remind you that Israel made peace with much larger enemies than the Palestinians before with Egypt and with Jordan and we proved ourself that we can live peacefully in our region.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Is the collective punishment though of people in Gaza self-defeating for Israel?

    HILIK BAR: It's not a collective punishment. I know the idea from a captain in the Israel IDF. The IDF is defending Israel. Its aim is not to hurt innocent civilians. Actually, this is the aim of Hamas, who is shooting thousands of missiles on innocent Israeli civilians. But there is casualties of war and we're all very, very sad for it, but when you have a terror organisation that shoot missiles from school, from UN facilities, from UNRWA facilities, from mosque. They have no other mean but to try and hurt their own citizens in order for the world to see that Israel is hurting innocent civilians. But Israeli is committed to defence our citizens and allow them to have a blue sky, free of rockets, like you have here in Australia.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: On Sunday, Israel laid claim to nearly 400 hectares of West Bank land. How will building more settlements bring about peace?

    HILIK BAR: I agree with you, it's a very poor decision. I think that the future of this territory should be decided upon a two-state solution between us and the Palestinians. We in the Labor Party, in the opposition to Netanyahu, are against any unilateral annexation. It think it's bad for Israel, it's bad for building trust between us and the Palestinians and we in the Israeli Labor Party will object this annexation of 400 hectares if it will come to the Knesset and we'll try to fight this poor decision in every win we will have.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Should Israel embrace the Arab Peace Initiative and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as a partner for peace?

    HILIK BAR: Definitely, yes. As for the Arab Peace Initiative, I think one of the poorest and the wrong mistake that Israel ever did diplomatically is not reply to the Arab Peace Initiative. We can say yes, we can say no and we can say yes, but we won't change this and that, but not replying for 12 year to the Arab Peace Initiative is not something that we can and should allow ourself. By the way, if I was Prime Minister, I wouldn't say a total yes to the Arab Peace Initiative. It's have a lot of problems as for Israel. But when 57 countries, Muslim countries, and 22 Arab countries coming to Israel and make an offer, Israel should reply. 

    As for President Mahmoud Abbas, he's not a perfect partner, but you will never find a perfect partner when you are talking about an enemy and Israel is now making the perfect the enemy of the good. Abbas is a good partner, he's a fair partner, more than Yasser Arafat that was before him and definitely I can bet more than the future leadership that the Palestinians are planning for Israel. And this is why we should strengthen Abbas at the expense of the Hamas, see him as our partner and go to a long way of negotiation with him as soon as possible.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Are there extremists on both sides of the Israel-Palestinian divide that don't want to see peace?

    HILIK BAR: Yeah, absolutely. There is an extreme right-wing in Israel that I cannot say that he don't want to see peace, but he's not willing to pay the necessary price and to make the necessary concessions in order to have future Palestinian states, which mean that he don't really promote peace. There is a lot of extremists in the Palestinian side, not only Hamas, but also other, but I can promise you that the majority of Israelis and the majority of the Palestinians are totally for a two-state solution and understand that a two-state solution is the only viable and acceptable solution between us and the Palestinian. No other solution, definitely not the one-state solution, will happen or we will allow it.

    CHRIS UHLMANN: Hilik Bar, thank you.

    HILIK BAR: Thank you so much.

    Aussies warned on the pitfalls of dual nationality

    $
    0
    0

    • (AAP) (Source: AAP)
    The Migration Institute of Australia says people need to be fully informed about the advantages and disadvantages of dual citizenship.
    By 
    Greg Dyett
     
    Source 
    World News Radio
    30 OCT 2013 - 7:46 AM  UPDATED 2 NOV 2013 - 3:49 PM
    (Transcript from World News Australia Radio)
    Being a citizen of two countries brings many advantages, such as better-paying jobs, access to two social security systems and the protection of two governments.
    But there are also many pitfalls.
    When dual Australian-Swiss citizen Ernst Harlacher travelled to Switzerland, he ended up with the country detaining him in its hospital system after he was diagnosed with dementia.
    Listen to the full story by clicking on the audio tab above.
    Despite his lawyer's best efforts he was prevented from returning to Australia, where he had lived for more than 40 years.
    He died in Switzerland last September.
    The executor of his estate, lawyer Peter Ng, says it serves as a reminder to people that Australia can be prevented from intervening to any great extent in foreign jurisdictions.
    "They need to recognise that there are instances where DFAT (the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) cannot do anything at all. They should also recognise that there are instances where DFAT isn't going to do very much, and this is the problem with Mr ...'s case, because DFAT took the option of leaving it to the Swiss because he was a Swiss national, born in Switzerland, (and was) in Switzerland. Had he gone to Russia via another country like Austria, he would have been fine."
    The national president of the Migration Institute of Australia, Angela Chan, has another warning.
    She says dual nationals can get caught out when it comes to compulsory military service that exists in countries such as Israel.
    "People who come to Australia and were born overseas and become citizens with either their family or when they get older, and then they return to their home country and they haven't, for example, done their military service before they left their home country, which is compulsory in many Middle Eastern and Asian countries, then they would be compelled to still undertake that military service."
    Then there are the added complications if a couple gets divorced with two jurisdictions and two sets of laws.
    And Ms Chan warns that situation can become far worse if there are children from the relationship that has broken down.
    "In many countries overseas, the male, or the father, has automatic rights to custody of the children, so it becomes a very serious issue. And people will do anything to protect their rights. And, often in cases with people overseas, they will exercise their rights of custody, and, you know, you could find that you could be left without your children."
    Ms Chan says dual nationals can be just like any others who take the attitude that the worst-case scenarios just will not apply to them.
    "Most people are aware of the problems that may arise with dual citizenship, but they have this very laissez faire attitude -- 'It won't happen to me, nothing's going to happen to me' -- and a lot of people go off, they get married overseas, people with all the good intentions in the world, they have a lovely family and everything, then, all of a sudden, the marriage breaks down. It's not a new phenomenon."

    National Lawyers Guild seeks to indict Obama for helping Israel build Iron Dome

    $
    0
    0

    GOOGLE: Muhammad treaty of hudaybiyyah

    $
    0
    0
     
     
    Muhammad treaty of hudaybiyyah
     
     
     
  • Treaty of Hudaybiyyah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Hudaybiyyah
    The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah (Arabic: صلح الحديبية) was an important event that ... It was a pivotal treaty between Muhammad, representing the state of Medina, ...
  • PA agreements modeled after Muhammad's Hudaybiyyah ...

    palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=157&doc_id=9401
    Jul 22, 2013 - after Muhammad's Hudaybiyyah Peace TreatyMuhammad signed a 10-year truce at Hudaybiyyah with the tribes of Mecca, but two years later ...
  • 10.The Peace Treaty of Hudaybiyyah - al-islaah publications

    alislaah3.tripod.com/alislaah/id11.html
    Then he said, 'Write, "This is what Muhammad, the Messenger(sallallahu alaiyhi .... TheHudaybiyyah treaty gave the idol-worshippers and Muslims an ...
  • The Event Of Hudaybiyyah | The Unschooled Prophet ...

    www.al-islam.org/unschooled-prophet-ayatullah.../event-hudaybiyyah
    The Quraysh and the Muslims, finally agreed to sign a peace treaty. ... is a contract being concluded between Muhammad, Allah's messenger and the Quraysh".
  • The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah | The Prophet of Mercy Website

    mercyprophet.org/mul/node/691
    Mercy for animals is a teaching of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) · Mercy for children is a ... Thus, the battle of Khaybar took place after the treaty of Hudaybiyyah.
  • Muhammad and the Treaty of Hudaybiyya - Answering Islam

    www.answering-islam.org/Silas/hudaybiyya.htm
    About ten miles outside of Mecca, by the spring of Hudaybiyya, Muhammad and the Meccans concluded a treaty known as the Treaty of Hudaybiyya. This treaty ...
  • Treaty of Hudaybiyyah - WikiIslam

    wikiislam.net/wiki/Treaty_of_Hudaybiyyah
    Jul 31, 2014 - The Treaty of Hudaybiyyah (صلح الحديبية) (also called Sulah-e-Hudaibiya) was a ten-year truce between Prophet Muhammad and the Pagan ...
  • The Treaty of Hudabiyyah - A Despicable Truce

    www.adespicabletruce.org.uk/page25.html
    THE TREATY OF HUDAYBIYYAH, 628 AD ... Then he said, "Write, “This is whatMuhammad the Messenger of Allah had agreed upon with Suhail bin Amru".
  • [Al-Hudaybiya and] Lessons from the Prophet Muhammad's ...

    www.danielpipes.org/.../al-hudaybiya-and-lessons-from-the-prophet-mu...
    Sep 1, 1999 - In the five years since he first alluded to Muhammad and the Quraysh, Arafat ... In the twenty-two months after signing the treatyMuhammad ...

  • The Treaty of al-Hudaybiyyah

    www.followislam.net/books/beacons/21.htm
    The Treaty of al-Hudaybiyyah ... The Prophet said: "Write 'This is what Muhammad, the Apostle of Allah has agreed upon with Suhayl ibn 'Amr.'" Suhayl ...
  • Viewing all 585 articles
    Browse latest View live