From:g87
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:24 AM
Cc:mitchell c
Subject: ABC reporter Sarah Dingle unquestioningly accepted that electric wires were used to shock a Palestinian ‘child’ into turning informant!
To Editor In Chief Chris Mitchell
I dare you to publish this ad verbatim or in reasonable context.
ABC radio reporter Sarah Dingle this morning unquestioningly accepted that electric wires were used to shock a Palestinian ‘child’ into turning informant!
Or – how to win friends and influence The Australian
Let me see if I have it right: you justifiably lacerated the ABC for their lamentable, unproven, unquestioning reporting on the so – called burned hands fiasco but you have no qualms about actually cooperating with said ABC when it comes to far worse, even less credible claims.
I refer to this morning’s promotion of John Lyons’ 4 Corners on AM. ABC reporter Sarah Dingle unquestioningly accepted that ‘’electric wires were used to shock a Palestinian ‘child’ into turning informant!’’
Worse: another ‘child’ – with intended implications of sweet innocence – was ‘’shackled to a cross – like structure.’’ Before he ‘’informed’’
Why was he not claimed to have crucified? You could easily have gone into this theological anti – semitic chimera? His alleged torture [on cross?] lasted 82 days – far worse than Jesus. Puhleez!
The above is sickening incantations of ABC / Lyons fraud. We have seen derivations of this in November 2011 in The Oz. Even the title of tonight’s programme is the same! How pathetically unoriginal.
The raison d’etre of the 4 Corners / Lyons programme is impeached in a major article in on – line JWire / Honest Reporting: I dare you to reproduce it [partly] as below. Or publish Honest Reporting / JWire item in full!
I dare you to publish this; you will not because you are running a protection racket for Lyons.
News for abc abbott shorten is running a protection ...
‘’Contrary to Lyons’ statement, the two legal systems in operation are divided between Israeli citizens (which, of course, includes both Jews and Arabs) and non-citizens. This is not a division based on race, ethnicity or religion but on the legal status of the disputed territories. The reason why Palestinians, both children and adults, are not subject to Israeli civil law is that Israel has never annexed the West Bank and therefore, Israeli law does not apply to the area. Instead, military law is applied.
It’s safe to say that Lyons would not advocate Israel’s annexation of the West Bank and it’s also safe to assume that were Israeli law to be administered in the disputed territories, there would be an international outcry and accusations of breaching so-called international law.
So it’s hardly surprising that Jewish children face a civil court. After all, how many Jewish children would find themselves in front of a military court charged with throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at Israeli cars or IDF soldiers?
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299